tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7713581199210787419.comments2020-11-20T16:47:14.807-06:00sapienti satAlexhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05175659272905202034noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7713581199210787419.post-68440973318867860512012-07-30T12:00:57.820-05:002012-07-30T12:00:57.820-05:00Thank you, Igor. As usual, I started with a commen...Thank you, Igor. As usual, I started with a comment which then evolved into another post: <br />http://sapienti-sat-3.blogspot.com/2012/07/evolution-of-architecture-part-ii-what.htmlAlexhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05175659272905202034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7713581199210787419.post-9598310648674808402012-07-28T18:58:46.608-05:002012-07-28T18:58:46.608-05:00Alex,
When you said you found youself in disagree...Alex,<br /><br />When you said you found youself in disagreement with my conclusions I expected to see a praise for emergent architectures at the very least. To my relief, as far as I can see, you're strongly agreeing. Even stronger than me :)<br /><br />I like the way you've described the limitations of the analogy, it is very precise and makes even stronger case. Although I strongly believe that the environment is not always as forgiving, as we might think. I can easily remember several high-profile projects that failed spectacularly and brought acquiring organizations on their knees because of tremendous budget and time overruns, and I'm sure you can give similar examples. For high-profile mission-critical initiatives where there's no allowance for things going wrong, the discipline of architecture is of extreme importance.<br /><br />IgorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com